{"id":16688,"date":"2023-08-24T19:46:11","date_gmt":"2023-08-25T00:46:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/?p=16688"},"modified":"2023-08-24T14:46:11","modified_gmt":"2023-08-24T19:46:11","slug":"private-foundations-disqualified-persons-must-color-within-the-lines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/private-foundations-disqualified-persons-must-color-within-the-lines\/","title":{"rendered":"Private foundations: \u201cDisqualified persons\u201d must color within the\u00a0lines"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><html><head><\/head><body><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/snd-store\/a\/89446368\/08_09_23_1938054880_npb_560x292.jpg\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Although conflict-of-interest policies are essential for all not-for-profits, private foundations must be particularly careful about adhering to them. In general, stricter rules apply to foundations. For example, you might assume that transactions with insiders are acceptable so long as they benefit your foundation. Not true. Although such transactions might be permissible for 501(3)(c) nonprofits, they definitely aren\u2019t for foundations. Specifically, transactions between private foundations and \u201cdisqualified persons,\u201d such as certain insiders, are prohibited.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A wide net<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The IRS casts a wide net when defining \u201cdisqualified persons.\u201d Its definition includes substantial contributors, managers, officers, directors, trustees and people with large ownership interests in corporations or partnerships that make substantial contributions to the foundation. Their family members are disqualified, too. In addition, when a disqualified person owns more than 35% of a corporation or partnership, that business is considered disqualified.<\/p>\n<p>Prohibited transactions can be hard to identify because there are many exceptions. But, in general, you should ensure that disqualified persons don\u2019t engage in these activities with your foundation:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Selling, exchanging or leasing property,<\/li>\n<li>Making or receiving loans,<\/li>\n<li>Extending credit,<\/li>\n<li>Providing or receiving goods, services or facilities, and<\/li>\n<li>Receiving compensation or reimbursed expenses.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Disqualified persons also shouldn\u2019t agree to pay money or give property to government officials on your\u00a0behalf.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Possible penalties<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>What happens if you violate the rules? The disqualified person may be subject to an initial excise tax of 10% of the amount involved and, if the transaction isn\u2019t corrected quickly, an additional tax of up to 200% of the amount. What\u2019s more, an excise tax of 5% of the amount involved is imposed on a foundation manager who knowingly participates in an act of self-dealing, unless participation wasn\u2019t willful and was due to reasonable cause. An additional tax of 50% is imposed if the manager refuses to agree to part or all of the correction of the self-dealing\u00a0act.<\/p>\n<p>Although liability is limited for foundation managers ($40,000 for any one act), self-dealing individuals enjoy no such limits. In some cases, private foundations that engage in self-dealing lose their tax-exempt\u00a0status.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Go the extra mile<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If you lead a private foundation, you must go the extra mile to avoid anything that might be perceived as self-dealing. Transactions between foundations and disqualified persons are firmly prohibited, and violating this rule can be costly. But it\u2019s easy to get tripped up by IRS rules. So contact us to help ensure you\u2019re coloring well within the\u00a0lines.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a9 2023<\/em><\/p>\n<p><\/body><br \/>\n<\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Although conflict-of-interest policies are essential for all not-for-profits, private foundations must be particularly careful about adhering to them. In general, stricter rules apply to foundations. For example, you might assume that transactions with insiders are acceptable so long as they benefit your foundation. Not true. Although such transactions might be permissible for 501(3)(c) nonprofits, they [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,10,15],"tags":[8,11,12],"class_list":["post-16688","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles","category-news","category-not-for-profit","tag-articles","tag-news","tag-updates"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16688","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16688"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16688\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16689,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16688\/revisions\/16689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}