{"id":16546,"date":"2023-03-24T00:36:05","date_gmt":"2023-03-24T05:36:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/?p=16546"},"modified":"2023-03-23T19:36:05","modified_gmt":"2023-03-24T00:36:05","slug":"awarded-money-in-a-lawsuit-or-settlement-its-only-tax-free-in-certain-circumstances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/awarded-money-in-a-lawsuit-or-settlement-its-only-tax-free-in-certain-circumstances\/","title":{"rendered":"Awarded money in a lawsuit or settlement? It\u2019s only tax-free in certain circumstances"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><html><br \/>\n  <head><br \/>\n  <\/head><br \/>\n  <body><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/snd-store\/a\/83731558\/02_28_23_1918628177_itb_560x292.jpg\" \/><\/p>\n<p>You generally must pay federal tax on all income you receive but there are some exceptions when you can exclude it. For example, compensatory awards and judgments for \u201cpersonal physical injuries or physical sickness\u201d are free from federal income tax under the tax code. This includes amounts received in a lawsuit or a settlement and in a lump sum or in installments.<\/p>\n<p>But as taxpayers in two U.S. Tax Court cases learned, not all awards are tax-free. For example, punitive damages and awards for unlawful discrimination or harassment are taxable. And the tax code states that \u201cemotional distress shall not be treated as a physical injury or physical sickness.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Here are the facts of the two cases.<\/p>\n<p><strong> Case #1: Payment was for personal injuries, not physical injuries <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A taxpayer received a settlement of more than $327,000 from his former employer in connection with a lawsuit. He and his spouse didn\u2019t report any part of the settlement on their joint tax return for the year in question. The IRS determined the couple owed taxes and penalties of more than $119,000 as a result of not including the settlement payment in their gross income.<\/p>\n<p>Although the settlement agreement provided the payment was \u201cfor alleged personal injuries,\u201d the Tax Court stated there was no evidence that it was paid on account of <em> physical <\/em> injuries or sickness. The court noted that the taxpayer\u2019s complaint against the employer \u201calleged only violations of (state) labor and antidiscrimination laws, wrongful termination, breach of contract, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The taxpayer argued that he had a physical illness that caused his employer to terminate him. But he didn\u2019t provide a \u201cdirect causal link\u201d between the illness and the settlement payment. Therefore, the court ruled, the amount couldn\u2019t be excluded from his gross income. (TC Memo 2022-90)<\/p>\n<p><strong> Case #2: Legal malpractice payment doesn\u2019t qualify for exclusion <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This case began when the taxpayer was injured while at a hospital receiving medical treatment. She sued for negligence but lost her case. She then sued her attorneys for legal malpractice.<\/p>\n<p>She received $125,000 in a settlement of her lawsuit against the attorneys. The amount was not reported on her tax return for the year in question. The IRS audited the taxpayer\u2019s return and determined that the $125,000 payment should have been included in gross income. The tax agency issued her a bill for more than $32,000 in taxes and penalties.<\/p>\n<p>The taxpayer argued that the payment was received \u201con account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness\u201d because if it wasn\u2019t for her former attorneys\u2019 allegedly negligent representation, she \u201cwould have received damages from the hospital.\u201d The IRS argued the amount was taxable because it was for legal malpractice and not for physical injuries. The U.S. Tax Court and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the IRS. (Blum, 3\/23\/22)<\/p>\n<p><strong> Strict requirements <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As you can see, the requirements for tax-free income from a settlement are strict. If you receive a court award or out-of-court settlement, consult with us about the tax implications.<\/p>\n<p><em> \u00a9 2023 <\/em><\/p>\n<p><\/body><br \/>\n<\/html><\/p>\n<p>You generally must pay federal tax on all income you receive but there are some exceptions when you can exclude it. For example, compensatory awards and judgments for &ldquo;personal physical injuries or physical sickness&rdquo; are free from federal income tax under the tax code. This includes amounts received in a lawsuit or a settlement and in a lump sum or in installments.<\/p>\n<p>But as taxpayers in two U.S. Tax Court cases learned, not all awards are tax-free. For example, punitive damages and awards for unlawful discrimination or harassment are taxable. And the tax code states that &ldquo;emotional distress shall not be treated as a physical injury or physical sickness.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Here are the facts of the two cases.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Case #1: Payment was for personal injuries, not physical injuries<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A taxpayer received a settlement of more than $327,000 from his former employer in connection with a lawsuit. He and his spouse didn&rsquo;t report any part of the settlement on their joint tax return for the year in question. The IRS determined the couple owed taxes and penalties of more than $119,000 as a result of not including the settlement payment in their gross income.<\/p>\n<p>Although the settlement agreement provided the payment was &ldquo;for alleged personal injuries,&rdquo; the Tax Court stated there was no evidence that it was paid on account of <em>physical<\/em> injuries or sickness. The court noted that the taxpayer&rsquo;s complaint against the employer &ldquo;alleged only violations of (state) labor and antidiscrimination laws, wrongful termination, breach of contract, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>The taxpayer argued that he had a physical illness that caused his employer to terminate him. But he didn&rsquo;t provide a &ldquo;direct causal link&rdquo; between the illness and the settlement payment. Therefore, the court ruled, the amount couldn&rsquo;t be excluded from his gross income. (TC Memo 2022-90)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Case #2: Legal malpractice payment doesn&rsquo;t qualify for exclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This case began when the taxpayer was injured while at a hospital receiving medical treatment. She sued for negligence but lost her case. She then sued her attorneys for legal malpractice.<\/p>\n<p>She received $125,000 in a settlement of her lawsuit against the attorneys. The amount was not reported on her tax return for the year in question. The IRS audited the taxpayer&rsquo;s return and determined that the $125,000 payment should have been included in gross income. The tax agency issued her a bill for more than $32,000 in taxes and penalties.<\/p>\n<p>The taxpayer argued that the payment was received &ldquo;on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness&rdquo; because if it wasn&rsquo;t for her former attorneys&rsquo; allegedly negligent representation, she &ldquo;would have received damages from the hospital.&rdquo; The IRS argued the amount was taxable because it was for legal malpractice and not for physical injuries. The U.S. Tax Court and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the IRS. (Blum, 3\/23\/22)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Strict requirements<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As you can see, the requirements for tax-free income from a settlement are strict. If you receive a court award or out-of-court settlement, consult with us about the tax implications.<\/p>\n<p><em>&copy; 2023<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You generally must pay federal tax on all income you receive but there are some exceptions when you can exclude it. For example, compensatory awards and judgments for \u201cpersonal physical injuries or physical sickness\u201d are free from federal income tax under the tax code. This includes amounts received in a lawsuit or a settlement and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,6,10],"tags":[8,11,12],"class_list":["post-16546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles","category-individual-tax","category-news","tag-articles","tag-news","tag-updates"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16546"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16546\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16547,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16546\/revisions\/16547"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sfw.cpa\/news-and-guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}